Ship the workflow that's been stuck on the roadmap.
A focused sprint that takes one workflow you already know matters and ships it end-to-end inside the tools your org already uses. Documented, handed off, and pressure-tested 30 days after launch.
One workflow, shipped end-to-end. Replaces months of internal back-and-forth or a typical $20–40K agency retainer. Starts at $4,500.
The "what to build" question is closed. The "who builds it" question isn't.
You already know which workflow this is. Maybe an audit landed on it. Maybe a leadership offsite did. Maybe it's been sitting in the roadmap for two quarters and keeps slipping. Whatever the route, the question of what is closed.
- Internal capacity is full. Engineering has a different roadmap
- The vendor list is too long, too generic, or too expensive
- The workflow stays where it's been: written down, agreed on, not running
- You don't want a managed service. You want it built and handed off
- You want one operator. Not a PM. Not three juniors.
A Build Sprint closes that gap.
One operator. Inside the tools your org already opens every morning. The deliverable isn't a recommendation or a plan. It's the workflow, working.
Book a discovery callWhat you get.
Not a prototype. A working workflow your org uses Monday morning: built where people already work, owned by a named person, and measured.
- A working AI workflow living inside your existing tools: Slack, Notion, HubSpot, Salesforce, Gmail, Airtable, whatever your stack already is. No new platform to log into. No new vendor relationship to manage.
- A shipped end-to-end build, not a prototype. Real inputs, real outputs, used by the people whose work it actually touches. The workflow runs the day after handoff, not "after one more sprint."
- A step-by-step guide and quick-reference runbook (what the industry calls an SOP) so the workflow survives staff turnover and isn't lodged in one person's head. Written for the person who runs it daily. Not an auditor.
- A named owner inside your org with a live handoff session. They leave the call running it themselves, not waiting on a follow-up email.
- A 30-day check-in (60-minute live call plus any needed adjustments) included in the price. Most workflows need one calibration after their first month under real-world traffic.
- A simple way to measure whether the workflow is earning its keep: a metric built in from the start so you don't have to guess.
The build is yours: no retainer, no managed service, no embedded license. If you want a follow-on sprint to build the next workflow, that's a separate conversation.
Your help building out an agent saved me time on a tedious task, made me more efficient, and delivered quality output. Having a strong starting point also gives me a solid foundation to build on.
One workflow. One operator. One handoff.
Kickoff
60 minutes. Confirm scope, what "shipped" looks like, the people and tools involved. If it's too big, I cut it down before kickoff ends.
The build
I sit inside your tools (scoped, time-bound access). You decide cadence: daily note, midpoint walkthrough, or just async questions.
Internal pilot
The first real users run it on actual work. I watch what breaks, what they use, what they ignore. Adjustments happen here.
Handoff
Live session with the named owner. SOP, runbook, KPI, failure modes. They leave the call running it. The build is theirs.
30-day check-in
One live call 30 days after handoff. We look at what's working, what isn't, and what to adjust. The calibration is included.
Built for three kinds of buyer.
If you don't see yourself in one of these, the sprint probably isn't right yet. And I'd rather tell you that on a call than after you've paid.
Founder-led service businesses (15–50)
The "what should we build" conversation already happened. You know which workflow would unlock founder time, shorten client delivery, or kill a recurring bottleneck. It hasn't shipped because building isn't the job of anyone you can spare. You want it built and handed off, not staffed.
Marketing or rev ops at growing SMBs (50–200)
You own a system (campaigns, lead routing, content production, reporting) that has an obvious AI-shaped hole. People around you agree on the gap. Procurement isn't the bottleneck. Internal build capacity is. You want one operator who's done this before.
Consultants and fractional executives
You've recommended a specific AI workflow to a client. They want it built. You don't want to subcontract to an agency. You want one operator who'll build cleanly, document it, and hand it off. Under your name as a co-engagement, or as a referral.
What the Sprint is. What it's not.
What this is
Focused build work inside your existing tools. One workflow, shipped, documented, handed off, and pressure-tested 30 days later by the same operator who built it.
What this is not
An AI strategy engagement, a tool selection process, a multi-workflow roadmap, a long-term retainer, or a managed service. It's also not the right move if you're not yet sure which workflow to build. That's the Assessment's job.
One operator. Builds inside your tools.
I'm Nathanael Tyre. I run NathanaelTyre.ai independently as Tyred Labs. I've shipped 50+ AI agents and 1000+ automation workflows across functions into production, a couple at the department level, and dozens of one-off support agents that solved a specific problem for a specific person.
What that experience taught me about building: the workflows that survive past launch aren't the most ambitious ones. They're the ones built inside the tools the org already uses, owned by a named person who didn't need a new platform to learn, with a KPI line that tells everyone whether the thing is earning its place. The Build Sprint is built around that pattern.
For the public AI projects I've shipped: LinkedIn.
The closest reference is a 30-minute walkthrough.
A Build Sprint deliverable is a working workflow, so a written sample doesn't fully convey it. The strongest reference is a short call where I walk through what one looks like in production. The Assessment sample is the closest written reference for the diagnostic style of work.
Starts at $4,500.
Where exactly your sprint lands depends on workflow complexity, integration scope, and the proof-rights agreement (testimonial, anonymized case study, or no public reference, the trade is named in writing before booking). The final number is fixed in writing before kickoff.
Payment is 50% on booking, 50% on handoff. The 30-day check-in is included. No separate invoice. Stripe-based invoicing. No retainers, no auto-renewals, no tier upsells embedded in this engagement.
For context: a contractor for a build like this typically runs $8,000–$15,000. An agency would quote the same project at $20,000–$40,000 with three people total (a build lead, a junior, and a project manager). This is one operator doing the work start-to-finish, with a handoff designed for your org to own without me.
FAQ.
Is this affiliated with a current or former employer?
No. NathanaelTyre.ai is independently owned and operated as Tyred Labs. The methodology, materials, and engagements have no relationship to any current or former employer. Work happens on personal time, on personal infrastructure, with no employer assets involved.
What if I'm not sure which workflow to build?
Then the Build Sprint isn't the next step yet. A paid Assessment is. The Company AI Assessment ($1,950) maps your org across five dimensions and surfaces the workflow worth building first. The Individual AI Assessment ($49) does the same for your own work. See all the Assessments →
If you'd rather not commit to a paid step yet, the 5-minute Quiz routes you to the right next step based on where you sit today. Get better with AI →
What happens to my data?
Default: your data stays inside your tools. The Build Sprint runs on scoped, time-limited access to the specific tools the workflow lives in (e.g., a Slack workspace, a HubSpot account, a Notion database). Access is documented in writing before any work begins, scoped to the minimum needed, time-boxed to the engagement, and revoked at handoff. A written data agreement is required before any engagement that touches personal, financial, contract, or NDA-covered data.
Full handling document: /data.
What's the timeline?
From kickoff to handoff, plus a 30-day check-in. Calendar reality: lead time from booking to kickoff is typically 1–3 weeks depending on availability.
What if the workflow is bigger than one sprint?
I cut it down before kickoff. If a workflow can't be shipped end-to-end in the sprint window, the right move is to pick the slice that can (the part with the highest payoff and the cleanest boundary) and ship that. The rest gets logged for a follow-on sprint. I don't take a build I can't finish in the window.
What if I want to build a second workflow afterward?
Some clients ship one sprint, run it for 30 days, then book a second to extend the workflow or build the next one. That's a separate engagement. Same shape, same scope rules. There's no contractual lock-in, no auto-renewal, and no embedded retainer between sprints.
Why is the price higher than the Assessment?
The Assessment ends with a written document. The Build Sprint ends with a working workflow your org uses on Monday morning. The Assessment costs less because it produces a recommendation; the Build Sprint costs more because it produces an operating asset. Two different products, two different outcomes. And either one can be the right move depending on where you actually are.
What's the refund policy?
If you've paid the deposit but kickoff hasn't happened yet, full refund. If we've completed kickoff but not the handoff, 50% refund. After the handoff, no refund. But if the workflow doesn't function as scoped, I'll fix it without re-invoicing until it does. The rare full-refund case (workflow not deliverable, scope drift on my end) is at my discretion.
How much time will my org need to put in?
During the sprint: plan for roughly 3–4 hours of your org's time total: kickoff (60 min), clarifying questions as they come up (30–60 min, async), internal pilot (30–60 min), and the handoff (60 min). I'm not asking your org to project-manage the build or learn a new platform.
After handoff: the named owner typically needs 30–60 minutes to get comfortable running it independently. The runbook is written for a non-technical operator. Most owners are running it on their own within a week. The 30-day check-in handles any first-month friction.
Will my org be able to run and update this without being AI experts?
Yes. The workflow is built inside tools your org already uses, and the documentation is written for the person who'll own it. Not for an AI engineer. The aim is that the named owner can run it, troubleshoot it, and explain it to a new hire without coming back to me.
Most workflows your org runs day-to-day don't need constant updating. AI tools change, but the underlying task doesn't: draft an email, summarize a meeting, route a lead. The workflow handles the task; the underlying model updates in the background and generally gets better, not worse.
If output quality slips after a major model change, that's exactly what the 30-day check-in is for. Most calibrations take under 30 minutes. If something bigger shifts six months from now and you want another pass, that's a follow-on sprint conversation. Not a standing obligation.
One workflow. Built. Running.
You already know which workflow this is. The next move isn't another strategy session, another tool comparison, or another quarter on the roadmap. It's focused build work that ends with the workflow running.